You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 23, December 17, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Hermans and colleagues raise several concerns, many of which were explicitly addressed by our methods. They cite substantial differences among included trials (specifically fixed vs titrated insulin dose and glucose levels actually achieved). We did not include trials that used a fixed insulin infusion rate without a glucose goal lower than 150 mg/dL in the tight control arm (such as early studies of glucose-insulin-potassium). Because we too hypothesized that degree of glycemic control ("normalization of blood glucose") might be important, we stratified analyses for all outcomes based on the glucose goal in the tight control arm (very tight, ≤110 mg/dL, vs moderately tight, 111-150 mg/dL). We also addressed the issue of trials not achieving the specified glucose goal by performing a sensitivity analysis in which studies were stratified into very tight and moderately tight glucose control according to actual achieved glucose level. We addressed the issue of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Renda Soylemez Wiener, MD, MPH
renda.s.wiener@dartmouth.edu
Dartmouth Medical School
Hanover, New Hampshire

Daniel C. Wiener, MD
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire

Robin J. Larson, MD, MPH
Outcomes Group
VA Medical Center
White River Junction, Vermont



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Benefits and Risks of Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults: A Meta-analysis
, , and
JAMA. ;300():933-944.
FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults
, , and
JAMA. ;300():2725-2725.
FULL TEXT  

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults
, , and
JAMA. ;300():2725-2726.
FULL TEXT  

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults
and
JAMA. ;300():2726-2726.
FULL TEXT  

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults

JAMA. ;300():2726-2726.
FULL TEXT  

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults--Reply
and
JAMA. ;300():2727-2728.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.