 |
 |

Low–Glycemic Index vs High–Cereal Fiber Diet in Type 2 Diabetes
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In their randomized controlled trial, Dr Jenkins and colleagues1 reported moderately reduced levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a low–glycemic index diet compared with a high–cereal fiber diet over 6 months. They concluded that low–glycemic index diets may be useful as part of the strategy to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Low–glycemic index diets are typically high-fiber diets. As the authors acknowledged, the low–glycemic index diet contained even more fiber than the high–cereal fiber diet (18.7 vs 15.7 g of fiber per 1000 kcal; P < .001). Several of the recommended foods in the high–cereal fiber group contained considerable amounts of soluble fibers (such as pectin in guava and carrots) that, unlike cereal fibers, do not appear to influence diabetes risk.2 In addition, starchy high–glycemic index food such as baked potatoes, emphasized in the high–cereal fiber . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Martin O. Weickert, MD
martin.weickert@charite.de
Andreas F. H. Pfeiffer, MD
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition Charité-University-Medicine Berlin Berlin, Germany
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Effect of a Low–Glycemic Index or a High–Cereal Fiber Diet on Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
David J. A. Jenkins, Cyril W. C. Kendall, Gail McKeown-Eyssen, Robert G. Josse, Jay Silverberg, Gillian L. Booth, Edward Vidgen, Andrea R. Josse, Tri H. Nguyen, Sorcha Corrigan, Monica S. Banach, Sophie Ares, Sandy Mitchell, Azadeh Emam, Livia S. A. Augustin, Tina L. Parker, and Lawrence A. Leiter
JAMA. 2008;300(23):2742-2753.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Low–Glycemic Index vs High–Cereal Fiber Diet in Type 2 Diabetes—Reply
David J. A. Jenkins, Cyril W. C. Kendall, and Gail McKeown-Eyssen
JAMA. 2009;301(15):1538-1539.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|